Bad Seeds: How Apple Reacts to Trademark Infringements

When it comes to trademark law, Apple doesn’t play around. Regardless of whether it’s about the well-known Apple logo or catchy product names with a lowercase i, anyone who uses the protected insignia without adequately marking them will receive a letter from top-class lawyers. The technology giant often takes action against small entrepreneurs, also from the Czech Republic. But what does all of this have to do with a cycle path near Bonn?

Update 11/08/2020: Apple Compares Apples to Pears

Update: The Prepear founders can breathe a sigh of relief: They were able to reach an out-of-court settlement with Apple. To do this, they only had to change their logo slightly and flatten the leaf on the stem of the pear. Since the adjustment is minimal, the start-up didn’t even have to register a new trademark. You can read about the dispute between Apple and the app operators here:

The operating company of the Prepear cooking app has five employees, who support users through shopping and cooking together. The company chose a stylised pear as its logo, which was a play on (prepare + pear). And it was precisely that pear that Apple didn’t like. Although Prepear and Apple have completely different business purposes, Apple took action against the logo with an injunction. They alleged the pear logo was clearly copied from Apple’s apple logo so there is a risk of confusion. According to its own statement, the dispute has already cost Prepear several thousand dollars, and a team member even had to leave because of it. Nevertheless, the small company doesn’t want to give up so easily and has launched a Change.org petition. Their goal is to have Apple withdraw their trademark complaint. The petition already has 72.000 supporters (as of: 14/08/2020). It remains to be seen whether Apple will soften its position. The other logo disputes you can read about here show that Apple doesn’t joke around with its logo:

Unplanned Attention for the Rhenish Apple Route

“Always bike around the apple”, it says on the website of the Rhein-Voreifel-Touristik e. V. (RVT). The association has been committed to the region since 2004 and sees itself as a point of contact for tourism. That’s why the association opened a themed cycle path called the “Rhenish Apple Route” on May 19th 2019, which aims to draw attention to the region’s agriculture and is supported by the European Regional Development Fund.

Like Comparing Apples with Apples ...

In the meantime, the route has received a lot of media attention, even if it’s only marginally related to the actual cycle path. It’s actually about the word / figurative mark chosen by the association, which shows the white silhouette of an apple with green leaves on a red background.

The logo had hardly been registered at the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA) in Munich when the association received a letter from the legal representatives of the technology giant Apple. They asked the RTV to limit the trademark registration to a few protection classes and also to change the green leaf. For example, protection class 6, if the signs are made of metal, and class 41, which deals with sporting and cultural activities, were mentioned.

David Against Goliath

The RTV then turned to a trademark lawyer who announced that the association was ready to restrict the trademark rights if Apple withdrew its objection. However, the association would not abandon the logo with the green leaf mentioned. Apple agreed to the deal. But the RTV still has legal fees in the low four-digit range, which it has to pay out of pocket.

Déjà-vu? Keep Your Hands off the Apple!

It’s not surprising if you’ve heard stories like this before. The international computer company keeps making headlines because of trademark disputes. At the beginning of March, the Norwegian Fremskrittpartiet (Frp) had problems when it wanted to protect its logo, which depicts a red apple with a green leaf. The party says it has been using the logo for 30 years. The Norwegian Patent Office grants a two-month deadline for filing a complaint – and in this case, too, a lawyer hired by Apple came forward. The parties are currently trying to avoid a direct conflict by examining other protection classes. In contrast to the RTV, the Frp would also be willing to make changes to the logo.

Even a Café Is Not Immune to Legal Letters from Apple

On top of that, there’s another case very close to the apple route. The Bonn Café Apfelkind got into trouble with Apple because of its use of a logo with an apple and a child’s head, similar to the RVT and Frp. The operator, Christin Römer, uses the “apple kid” on dishes and furniture. Her design is so successful that she wants to expand the business into a franchise, and she is also toying with the idea of developing a fashion label. She no longer has to worry whether the legal dispute with Apple will cost more time, nerves and thousands of euros. After two years of back and forth with the company, she has been allowed to keep her logo.

A Real exali Claim

At exali, we had another case where Apple Inc. took action against a trademark infringement. A web developer specialised in developing browser software that was compatible with Apple’s hardware. He wanted to make this clear in his product name and therefore decided on a term in which a protected Apple trademark was integrated. He made sure to adhere to the terms of use. These terms describe, among other things, that components of the brand may be used for advertising purposes if compatible software is developed. In the opinion of Apple, the IT service provider had interpreted these rules too generously. The result: A cease and desist letter from a lawyer with a 4.000 Euro reimbursement claim.

However: Professional Indemnity Insurance Was Able to Prevent Worse Problems

Half a year before the incident, the web developer had taken out Professional Indemnity Insurance through exali so he had someone at his side in the matter. The insurer had an elaborate appraisal drawn up, the claims checked and hired a lawyer. The aim was to determine how the terms of use should be interpreted. The trademark law specialists involved actually found a trademark violation on the part of our client and advised him not to continue using the trademarks and domains. With the time gained, the web developer was able to rename his company and switch to new domains. And he was able to do that before the product was launched on the market.

It’s not just when dealing with international corporate giants that it becomes clear how important so-called passive legal expenses insurance is as part of professional indemnity insurance. In the event of a claim, the insurer not only pays compensation for damages, but also all lawyer, expert and court costs associated with the matter and is on hand to provide advice and assistance.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact our customer service. Your personal contact is there for you at any time, without a call center or queue.

Calculate your premium and get your professional liability insurance online in just a few steps here: